Effective and Dynamic Leadership Free Essays

string(209) " to the mission and to the people you lead, Taking responsibility for the accomplishment of the mission and the welfare of those you lead, assuming risk of loss and failure, Accepting recognition for success\." â€Å"The successful organisation has one major attribute that sets it apart from unsuccessful organisations: dynamic and effective leadership. † What is leadership? A simple definition of leadership is that leadership is the art of motivating a group of people to act towards achieving a common goal. It’s one of the important factors in an organisation. We will write a custom essay sample on Effective and Dynamic Leadership or any similar topic only for you Order Now Few things are more important to human activity than leadership. Effective leadership helps an organisation through times of peril. It makes a business organization successful.It enables a not-for-profit organization to full fill its mission. The absence of leadership is equally dramatic in its effects. Without leadership, organizations move too slowly, stagnate and lose their way. When we speak about leaders in organisations first thing that comes to our mind is decision making, but that’s not all. Leadership in an organisation goes beyond this, after making the decision the main thing is to execute it and that’s where an organisation faces a lot of problem and this is the place where effective leadership is required. A leader in an organisation plays an important role in influencing their follower’s behaviour. Investors recognize the importance of business leadership when they say that a good leader can make a success of a weak business plan, but that a poor leader can ruin even the best plan. (example of a corporate leader). Investors recognize the importance of business leadership when they say that a good leader can make a success of a weak business plan, but that a poor leader can ruin even the best plan (D. Quinn Mills in his book â€Å"How to Lead, How to live†).I agree to the statement said by Hersey and Blancard and support this thought of mine with the following literature. As rightly said by Hersey and Blanchard’s (1977) â€Å"The successful organisation has one major attribute that sets it apart from unsuccessful organisations: dynamic and effective leadership. † In an organisation it’s important that they have an effective leader. Because it’s the leader who influences the thoughts, attitudes and behaviour of his followers or in other words of the employees working under him in an organisation.He is the person who sets the direction for the people under him; he helps us see what lies ahead; he helps us visualize what we might achieve; he encourages us and inspires us. Without leadership a group of human beings quickly degenerates into argument and conflict, because we see things in different ways and lean toward different solutions. Leadership helps to point us in the same direction and harness our efforts jointly. A leader in a successful organisation has the ability to get other people to do something significant that they might not otherwise do.They energise people towards a goal. Without followers, however, a leader isn’t a leader, although followers may only come after a long wait. For example, during the 1930s Winston Churchill urged his fellow Englishmen to face the coming threat from Hitler’s Germany. But most Englishmen preferred to believe that Hitler could be appeased—so that a war could be avoided. They were engaged in wishful thinking about the future and denial that the future would be dangerous. They resented Churchill for insisting that they must face the danger. They rejected his leadership.He had very few followers. But finally reality intruded—Germany went too far and war began. At this point Churchill was acclaimed for his foresight, and became prime minister of the United Kingdom during the Second World War. During this period almost all Englishmen accepted his leadership willingly. There’s an old saying that the way to become a leader is to find a parade and run to the front of it. We refer to a person â€Å"leading† a parade, but walking at the front isn’t really leadership unless the person in front is actually choosing the direction!If the person isn’t choosing the direction, then being at the front of the line is merely a way to pretend to be a leader. Leadership can be used for good or ill. Hitler seemed to be a leader of the German people, but he set an evil direction. He had great leadership skills, but put them to terrible uses. Sometimes people in business use leadership skills to exploit others. Sometimes people in charitable organizations use leadership skills to benefit themselves rather than the people they are supposed to help.Leadership skills can be perverted to pursue bad ends. This is what sets a successful organisation apart from the unsuccessful organisation because in a successful organisation in most cases the leaders are faithful to their job and lead the people working under them in the right direction; lead them towards the organisational goal well as in an unsuccessful organisation the leader looks for his personal benefit/profit. He does not care of the organisational goal which leads to the failure of the organisation.Leadership can be defined in many ways such as power, influence, path-builder, director. But most commonly Leader is person who influences the thoughts and behaviour’s of others; a leader is one who establishes the direction for others to willingly follow. One person can serve as a leader or several persons might share leadership. A person may be appointed as leader or may be elected by people within his circle. Leaders play vital role in standardizing performance. Leaders can influence other to perform beyond the expectations.Managers plan, organize, lead and control so that â€Å"leading† and â€Å"managing† are inseparable, they are both integral part of each other. If one cant influence and inspire others to work willingly towards aims then all planning and organizing will be ineffective. Similarly setting direction is usually not enough, no matter how inspiring one can be, management skills are crucial. Thus the leaders in an successful organisation have leadership as well as managerial skill which make them stand out from those leaders of unsuccessful organisation.A leader in a successful organisation has the following qualities, having a vision about what can be accomplished; making a commitment to the mission and to the people you lead, Taking responsibility for the accomplishment of the mission and the welfare of those you lead, assuming risk of loss and failure, Accepting recognition for success. You read "Effective and Dynamic Leadership" in category "Papers" These qualities of a leader in a successful organisation set him apart from the leader of a unsuccessful organisation. A leader in a successful organisation is able to express his or her vision clearly and in a compelling manner so that others are engaged by it.He makes a commitment to his or her vision, to the organization, and to the members of the organization. A leader can’t be committed one day and uninterested the next. People will judge a leader by his or her commitment, and will commit themselves no more than the leader does. He assumes a considerable amount of responsibility not just for the mission that he or she urges others to accept, nor just for the organization he or she heads, but for his or her followers, their lives and efforts, as well. He assumes risk. If there is no risk, little leadership is required.If the effort is easy and certain to succeed, anyone can, and probably will, â€Å"lead† it. But where the effort entails a risk of failure, then many people will quail before the challenge and leadership is necessary to get people to make the commitment and the effort to succeed. In most organizations, one associates high levels of leadership with high levels of authority. The chief executive of a company usually plays more of a leadership role than people at lower levels of the hierarchy in the firm. It is the same in not for profits and government agencies.The higher on the job ladder a person is, the more he or she is expected to exhibit leadership. In the military, however, the opposite holds true, and for a very good reason. In the military the greatest leadership Challenge is to get other people to risk their lives in combat. Generally, the higher one goes in the chain of command, the less exposure he has to the battlefield, and the less exposure to men and women who are in combat. The officers who have responsibility for commanding soldiers in combat have the greatest leadership challenge, for they must get others to risk their lives. A leader in a successful organisation has a vision on which he is focused on. He leads the people working under him towards this vision in a systematic way. He moves towards his vision with the help of the following strategy; Creating a vision a mission and a strategy, Communicating the vision/mission/strategy and getting buy-in, Motivating action, Helping an organization grow, evolve, and adapt to changing circumstances. The leader provides a mission of what needs to be done and a strategy, a path, for how to accomplish the mission and achieve the vision, a way for the group to get there.But having an exciting vision, an exciting mission, and a careful strategy is not sufficient. The leader clearly communicates with the employees. Because of this communication people grasp the vision to which they commit. Finally, a vision cannot be rigid and unchanging; it must adapt to changing circumstances, growing and evolving. Otherwise it becomes outdated and obsolete, and loses its power to excite and motivate people. Most of the successful organisations have a common factor, what is this common factor?It is the Level 5 leader that they have. A level 5 leader is a paradoxical combination of deep personal humility with intense professional will. An example of a level 5 leader is Darwin Smith – CEO at paper-products maker Kimberly-Clark from 1971 to 1991 he epitomizes level 5 leadership. Shy, awkward, shunning attention, he also showed iron will, determinedly redefining the firm’s core business despite Wall Street’s scepticism. The formally dull Kimberly-Clark became the worldwide leader in its industry, generating stock returns 4. times greater than the general markets. When we speak of a level 5 leader in a successful organisation the quality of humility stands out and this is what makes them different from those leaders in an unsuccessful organisation. The leader routinely credits others, external r factors, and good luck for their companies’ success. But when results are poor, he blames himself. Jim Collins in his book â€Å"Level 5 Leadership – The Triumph of Humility and Fierce Resolve† explains this concept of Level 5 leadership in the best way.He writes about five different levels of leadership; according to him there are five levels of leaders each having different characteristics. Level 1 are those leaders who are highly capable individuals, they make productive contributions through talent, knowledge, skills, and good work habits. Level 2 leaders are those leaders who are contributing team members; they contribute to the achievement of group objectives and work effectively with others in a group setting. Level 3 leaders are leaders who are competent managers; they organize people and resources toward the effective and efficient pursuit of predetermined objectives.Level 4 leaders are effective leaders; they catalyze commitment to and vigorous pursuit of a clear and compelling vision; stimulates the group to high performance standards. And finally are the level 5 leaders who Collin terms as executives. They build enduring greatness through a paradoxical combination of personal humility plus professional will. These are the leaders we find in most of the successful organisations. These are leaders with highest capabilities in the hierarchy of leaders. Leaders at the other four levels in the hierarchy can produce high levels of success but not enough to elevate organizations from mediocrity to sustained excellence good-to-great transformations don’t happen without Level 5 leadership. Level 5 is not the only requirement for transforming a good organization into a great one. Other factors include getting the right people on the bus (and the wrong people off the bus) and creating a culture of discipline. Level 5 leader is on top of a hierarchy of capabilities, four other layers lie beneath it each one is appropriate in its own right, but none with the power of Level 5.We do not need to move sequentially through each level of the hierarchy to reach the top but to be a fully-fledged Level 5; we need the capabilities of all the lower levels, plus the special characteristics of level 5. Level 5 leaders are extremely modest, they don’t talk about themselves instead they would talk about the organization, about the contributio n of others and instinctively deflect discussion about their own role unlike big personalities like Lee Iacocca, Jack Welch. Besides extreme humility, Level 5 leaders also display tremendous Professional will. They possess inspired standards, cannot stand mediocrity in any form, and utterly intolerant of anyone who accept the idea that good is good enough. Level 5 leaders do not have any ambition for themselves instead have an ambition for the organisation they work for. They routinely select superb successors and are very particular about this because of which the organisations performance is always positive. They want to see their organizations Become even more successful in the next generation comfortable with the idea that most people won’t even know that the roots of that success trace back to them.Level 5 leaders, inherently humble, look out the window to apportion credit – even undue credit – to factors outside themselves if they cannot find a specific event or person to give credit to, they credit good luck (Window and Mirror concept by J Collin). All these characteristics of the level 5 leader leads the organisation towards success setting it apart from the un successful organisations. While most would agree that leadership is an art, it is also the ability to lead others toward a common goal or objective and to influence others. As the old age saying goes â€Å"Lead by example† makes a powerful statement about leadership.To lead by example simply means to lead as you would have your followers lead or to do as you would have your followers do. Many people believe that leadership is a way to improve how they present themselves to others. Corporations want people who have leadership ability because they believe these people provide special assets to the organization. Essentially, one’s leadership knowledge, skill and ability, is based upon personal motives. Some people are motivated to lead because they believe in an inherent ability to do so these are the leaders in a successful organisation.While others lead for personal gain including position, power and money who resemble leaders in an unsuccessful organisation because of these types of leaders in most cases organisations fail to achieve their goal. A leader’s skill determines how effective a leader is because followers are more likely to follow a leader who appears to know what he or she is doing. Behind every effective leader is a good follower. Good followership is critical to the success of every leader and eventually to every organization. In a successful organisation in most cases the employees are dependent upon their leader/boss for the day to day operations.They have the confidence in their leader and thus follow his instructions; this helps the organisation in its smooth running. Where as in a unsuccessful organisation the employees lack the confidence in their leader/boss and thus they try doing the work in their own way which disrupts the working enviourment and leads to conflicts in the organisation. A leader influences the behaviour of the people to work willingly and enthusiastically for achieving predetermined goals of the organisation. According to Terry â€Å"Leadership is essentially a continuous process of influencing behaviour.A leader breaths life into the group and motivates it towards goals. The lukewarm desires for achievement are transformed into a burning passion for accomplishment. † It’s very important for the leader to carry him in an appropriate manner at all times because his followers always look up to him as a perfect example. A perfect example of how a leader impacts the running of a organisation is of Rich Teerlink, former chairman and CEO of Harley Davidson Inc. In the 1980s Harley-Davidson was almost knocked out of business by competition from other firms. To survive, it needed to change dramatically. Rich Teerlink, the company’s leader, was able to save the firm financially, but with the pressure off, the challenge of continuing to improve seemed even more daunting. Could Teerlink get his managers and employees to make the significant, and to many of them inconvenient, changes necessary? He did it by building a different company, one driven from the bottom up by employees rather than from the top down by managers. It’s a story of successes and failures, advances and setbacks, dead ends and breakthroughs, ending in a much stronger company than before.The leader in an organisation decides who is going to be assigned to the necessary tasks and how they will fit into the organization. She supervises the actions people take, ensuring that they are doing the right things, that no money is being misappropriated or wasted (we call this â€Å"controlling†), and when problems arise the leader helps to resolve them. Finally, by combining these tasks into a coherent whol e, the leader in an organisation makes the organization operate efficiently. Running an organization effectively requires administration, management, and leadership. Leadership is ordinarily in shorter supply than administrative or managerial competence. Leadership is more important and more demanding for most people. Fewer people are able or willing to be leaders, so it tends to be a higher calling than administration or management. There is a large literature discussing the differences between leaders and managers. There is also an important distinction to make between leaders and administrators. In general, a leader takes a broader view and points an organization toward necessary, even critical, change. True leadership is special, subtle, and complex. Too often we confuse things like personal style and a position of authority with leadership. No matter what type of leader you are, a leader’s motive determines how they lead and why they lead the way they do. In a successful organisation the leader plays a very important and lead role. His followers are totally dependent on him for important decision making and guiding them in the right direction in achieving the organisations goal. It further reveals that some leaders ‘lead by example’ while others want followers to do what they are unwilling to do.This is due to a chosen leadership style, trait and character based upon who they are and their individual motives. The leaders who follow the concept of â€Å"Lead by example† resemble leaders in an successful organisation. For these leaders, leading the organisation towards its goal is a passion they have no personal benefit thoughts behind it. Observation is based on the premise that leaders lead with an individual purpose, which may or may not be based upon the goals and objectives of the organization. Are they leading for results, personal gain or for the advancement of others?It could be skill or character based or based upon leadership style. Yet, the leader has motives that make up who the individual leader is and why they lead the way they do. Good leaders are made not born. If you have the desire and willpower, you can become an effective leader. Good leaders develop through a never ending process of self-study, education, training, and experience. To inspire your workers into higher levels of teamwork, there are certain things you must be, know, and, do. These do not come naturally, but are acquired through continual work and study.Good leaders are continually working and studying to improve their leadership skills; they are NOT resting on their laurels. Leaders in a successful organisation will simultaneously fill many roles interacting, motivating group members, solving conflicts as they arise. Leaders in a successful organisation set vision, strategies, goals, and values in order to guide for desired action and behaviour. Effective leaders in a successful organisation have two major qualities: knowledge and communication competence. Leader needs knowledge of issue and the ways of effectively leading a team. This knowledge will enable leader to identify alternatives available. He also needs to be an effective communicator as equally listener and speaker. Leaders should acquire qualities of flexible, openness, empathetic, courage, interactive, and positive attitude. Finally, a leader in a successful organisation is flexible in accepting the views of his followers after which making the right decision. All these qualities of a leader in a successful organisation set him apart from those of an unsuccessful organisation.References: Books 1. John P. Kotter, â€Å"Leading Change† USA Harvard Business School Press, 1996 2. Michael Useem, â€Å"The Leadership Moment: Nine true stories of TRIUMPH and DISASTER and their lessons for all of us† Three Rivers Press, 1999 Articles 1. Jim Collins article, â€Å"Level 5 Leadership: The Triumph of Humility and Fierce Resolve†, in Best Of HBR, HBR, July-August, 2005, pages. 136-146 2. Katz, R. L. (1955). Skills of an Effective Administrator. Harvard Business Review, 33(1) pages 33-42. Internet 1. Angelia Arrington, â€Å"A Leader is as a Leader Does† Leader lab vol:1 Issue-1 www. theleaderlab. org 2. D. Quinn Mills, â€Å"Leadership: How to lead, How to live† 2005 http://www. mindedgepress. com 3. www. hbr. org How to cite Effective and Dynamic Leadership, Papers

Team Work Excellent Communication

Question: Discuss about theTeam Workfor Excellent Communication. Answer: Introduction The objective of this assignment was to work in a group and required us to develop a case study report based on the scenario. Its my believe that this teamwork was useful in achieving the objectives we set out to make. The factors that contributed to this success are; aceepting general inputs from members, asking questions, giving ideas, and excellent communication.We had many discussions via various communication channels regarding our approach on the assignment. Our team used multiple online tools such as Skype, wiki group, and Googledocs. These online platforms provided us with opportunities to develop several online skills. Some of the skills developed completing this task include online communication, collaboration, creative thinking and critical thinking. This enabled my team to work efficiently. Constructivist methods to teach are linked with insgighful learning, growth in critical, creative and thinking skills and increased learner confidence. Social constructivism theory provides that individuals absorb well when they participate in learning tasks with other people (Berkeley University of California, 2015). Working as a group has many benefits. When a team works together, it allows participants share knowledge and information. The team also learn to generate meaning, and resolve challenges by cooperating with peers our peers using critical examination and thinking.This leads to developing a more in-depth knowledge of the things learned. There are equally as many challenges as benefits for teamwork through the means of online collaboration. Some of the limitations include physical distance, media time, setting tasks, organisation, as well as not knowing other team members. On the other hand, when these challenges are overcome, these are also vital skills to have for learning. From my experience working in a team environment, has further developed my skills and thinking by being involved with online communication. This has allowed me to express my ideas more frequently. A strategy that I will use in the future is to communicate more with team members and to lead by example. What I found significant and meaningful which I can always utilize in the future is to commit to responsibilities, take more responsibility, trust is critical to a teams success, having a clear purpose and to communicate more with team members. Also, supporting team members is essential. Every team member must understand their and learn how use it positively to the teams success.Therefore, these factors help in creating an efficientan active team. References What Are the Characteristics of Good Teamwork Habits?. (2016). Smallbusiness.chron.com. Retrieved 29 September 2016, from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/characteristics-good-teamwork-habits-20848.html Regents, U. (2016). GSI teaching resource center. Retrieved September 29, 2016, from https://gsi.berkeley.edu/gsi-guide-contents/learning-theory-research/social-constructivism/

The Invisible Man free essay sample

The Invisible Man The Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison is a novel that explores racism in the 1930’s through the eyes of the narrator, a young black man. The novel describes the story of a young unnamed black man in the 1930’s that is very hopeful for his future, but fails to realize how prominent racism is in the United States. This naivety soon gets him expelled when he reviles his identity to a white peer. After this disheartening incident occurs the narrator is forced to move to Harlem, New York, and becomes the spokesmen for the Communist Party, known as the Brotherhood. Yet, as he works for the organization he still finds himself lost in this world which he is yet to know. This position puts himself in grave dangers with political enemies and racial purists who force him to face the truth of racism and the absence of his identity. We will write a custom essay sample on The Invisible Man or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page As he learns more about himself and the world around him he gets caught up in a violent riot which drives him into a manhole. In the desolate solitude and the midnight darkness he begins to discover his identity and how transparent he was. Then he vows to write his life story, and only when it is complete will he enter the world above. In his autobiography he details his life affairs, a purposeful theme, and a vital mood. Fascinatingly the main character of the Invisible Man has no name and the book is personally narrated and written by him and it recalls his story as the â€Å"invisible man† because throughout the story he seems to be invisible due to racial stereotypes and mistreatment. He writes about the racial inequality throughout the book very vividly, and one occasion of racial injustice is when the narrator is found to be a colored man and immediately banished him from the college. This blatant inequality outraged the orator and opens him to the cruelties of a society fueled by racism. This event is believed to have revealed to him the true nature of the world and challenged him to begin to live on his instinct and remove his ignorance. When the narrator comes to this realization he moves to Harlem and becomes a vital spokesperson to a communist party called the Brotherhood, but finds himself surrounded by racism even in his on organization. Thanks to his immense intellect he grows from his experiences and seeks a solution to the shackles  of discrimination. It is not until he is forced to live in the sewers that his action becoming impactful especially after he writes his autobiography and discovers his identity. This revelation leads the narrator to live a life geared towards responsibly and effectively change society with all his abilities. There are a number of themes to be found in the Invisible Man and the amount of wisdom that can be identified in the orator’s anguishes is both useful and vital to not only the reader, but the people as a whole. One of the most critical ideas is that tragic ordeals and experiences build people for better or worse. This is prominently displayed at the end of the novel when the narrator finally decides to dwell on his past experiences and writes his autobiography. Only when this occurs do we see the author become a selfless man on the goal of changing discrimination in society. Another theme in the story is that racism is an obstacle of not only individuals, but society. Throughout the story it is obvious that the narrator is having an inner struggle trying to discover who he is, but is barricaded by racism. It is not until the narrator traveled from community to community that he began to understand the struggle he had been living for all his life. This struggle is to find your own path and commit to it with your talents and abilities. These are the people who develop and transform society and understand that they are interdependent to others like themselves. The mood throughout the Invisible Man is crucial to portraying the message and exaggerating the importance events within the books. For instance, when the narrator is entering the school hopeful for his future the mood is very surreal and dream-like, but once the narrator is forced out of school the mood slowly becomes disheartening and gradually gets more and more nightmarish as the book continues until he discovers his true identity at least. The bleakest mood in the book is definitely when the orator is working for pennies in the Liberty Paints Plant and is basically enslaved. Yet, throughout the story the mood somehow had a slight sliver of optimism no matter the situation. The author even uses the mood as both a reflection of his past and a foreshadowing mechanism. A great testimony to this is when the narrator is finally in college he sense a feeling of despair and loneliness. This obviously foreshadows his removal from the college and his eventual exile to New York for work. No matter how or when different moods are used in the novel it is essential to the book and how the readers relate to the story. Overall this book is very exceptional. It definitely provides a very thorough and personal background of racism in the 30’s. It also documents very well the effects of racism on individuals and shows us the strain it places on a community and a society. I honestly chose this book expecting it to be about the actual invisible man (horror monster) like in the old 30’s movie, but I found myself pleasantly surprised with this novel and its great message. I would say the largest bit of wisdom is not to let hatred and emotions become the basis of what we act on, but rather educated thoughts and ideas to derive action. All in all I would recommend this book to anyone interested on the topic and I am very joyful this is the book that I actually read instead of what I thought it was.

The Bourgeoisie and Proletariet essays

The Bourgeoisie and Proletariet essays The bourgeoisie and proletariet have both similarities and differences in their emergence and development as a class. They both emerged out of a separate society and developed their own. The bourgeoisie grew out of the feudal society and the need to develop a modern industry. The proletarians grew out of the bourgeoisie society and their need for change and stability. They both need to have centralized power in order for each society to grow. The bourgeoisie has centralized their means of production and has concentrated property in a few hands (p. 13). The proletariet has formed trade unions in order to gain more power. Both these initiatives have formed political parties. The differences among these two classes are great. The bourgeoisie people are always in need for growth and change. They are constantly revolutionizing their means of production (p.12). They are an independent society. With their development of a modern industry they have brought many different societies through out the nation to depend on them (p. 13). The proletarians are on the other hand very dependent on the bourgeoisie for survival. Without them they could not exist. The proletarian grew out of the bourgeoisie's exploitation of the working laborer. Without the constant development of modern industry the proletarian would not be able to work and their plight would be no more. With the development of modern industry the proletarian not only increases in number, it becomes concentrated in greater masses; it's strength grows (p. 17). The proletarians own no property while the bourgeoisie own industries (p. 20). All these struggles described in the Communist Manifesto are still going on today. The modern bourgeoisie are the Microsoft corporations of the world. The proletarians are the the working class unions. Not much has changed from 1848 till now. ...

A single economic concept Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

A single economic concept - Essay Example The process aims at identifying the costs that the company can reduce in the long run or ways that the company can increase its revenues in the long run which can marginally increase the element of profit for it for a given level of output or even by increasing the level of output. (Investorwords) Whichever cost is sustained by a company can be grouped into two categories which are variable costs and fixed costs. Variable costs change with the increase in the output while the fixed costs are sustained by the entity stay the same whatever be the output, which also includes zero output. When the company has attained the point where its total costs have equaled the total revenue, it has reached the point of break even and each additional product of the company will generate pure profit for which only the variable costs will be charged and the fixed cost will be spared as the breakeven has already covered them so an increase in the level of output can aid in the profitability of the company with greater margin of profit. For each unit sold or service offered, the marginal profit of the company is the difference of the revenue and the cost of that particular product. If the revenue for a unit of product is greater than the unit cost of that product then the profit for the unit is positive and vice

Latino film Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Latino film - Essay Example Similarly, the character of Frida Kahlo in 2002 Frida film (dir. Julie Taymor) is a central figure in a movie that tells the story of Frida Kahlo’s life. This character, despite some major differences from the character of Rosa, is able to fight for her own happiness and evolves as a strong representation of a Latin American woman. THESIS STATEMENT: Although women in El Norte and Frida are represented through completely different stories, time periods, and in totally different contexts, they have several important things in common. First of all, they both struggle against life circumstances; they both set out on a quest for happiness; they both evolve as strong personalities; and they both face untimely deaths without having found happiness on earth. Rosa in the Movie El Norte Rosa and her brother Enrique are the protagonists of El Norte, an epic movie about immigration and cultural conflicts and the quest for happiness. At its simplest, the movie may be perceived as a chronic led attempt of two Guatemalan teenagers to escape the brutalities of the military regime in Guatemala through illegal emigration to the United States. Rosa (Zaide Silvia Guierrez), a teenage Guatemalan girl, is portrayed epically, through a range of events in her life. She thinks, decides, acts, and eventually occupies the leading position in the film: when she dies, Enrique’s (David Villalpando) life goes empty and he supposedly commits a suicide. In this section of the paper, the focus will be put on the character of Rosa: what role it has in the film, how she changes throughout the film, how she struggles for her happiness, and how she evolves as a strong personality in due course of the film. Rosa’s central role in El Norte is evidenced by her clear decision-making part and her drive to find a better place to live, to achieve happiness and peace. An Indian woman by origin, she takes the decision to take her chances and flee to the U.S. with her brother Enrique. The off-spring of the Maya who have lived in Guatemala for centuries, Rosa makes up her mind to seek peace and happiness in a totally different culture. Raised on myths of the Mayan people, who have their own perception of the world and their own vision of life, Rosa makes a really tough decision. For her, to go to the United States or to go el norte means to enter the world totally alien and appallingly different. Yet she takes this step driven by her desire to find a home far away from the place where she was born and raised. Indeed, Guatemala failed to be her home, so Rosa hopes to find another one. While these dreams are not devoid of practical background (Rosa gets to know from Enrique that in the United States even poor people own their cars), her decision is more romantically inspired than carefully developed. Anyway, in the empty house where she and Enrique are under the threat of being murdered or abducted (just as their parents were), no one waits for them, except for the gho sts of their ancestors. Thus, there is no choice. Yet, there is hope. Hence, Rosa’s central role is displayed through her decision-making, which proves central to the whole movie. As a female character, Rosa constructs her character through a series of morose events and happenings, all of which leave an imprint on her tender yet resolute self.

What Immigration Quotas Are Allowed Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

What Immigration Quotas Are Allowed - Assignment Example Immigration quotas are defined as barriers that restrict undesirable movement of population from one geographical region towards the other. Immigrants, wanted or otherwise, are both beneficial as well as have a negative influence on an economy. However, considering both the pros and cons of the same, countries across the globe tend to develop certain restrictions on the number of permitted immigrants existing at a given point in time in proportion to the population of the country itself (Weissbrodt, 2005). For example, a country X might form a proportion that for every 4 locals, there would be 1 immigrant, implying that if their local/domestic population is 4 million, there would be a maximum of 1 million immigrants allowed. Additionally, countries also tend to develop quotas on other countries about their maximum export of humans; for example, amongst the 1 million in the given example, the country X might decide that a maximum of 30% from Asia, and within that a maximum of 10% from India. Such obligations define the immigration quota developed by various countries to control the flow of resources and to keep other economic factors in balance such as exchange rate, the balance of payments, outflow of currency, taxes, crime rate, investments, development projects, fiscal policies, etc. This section discusses the arguments that favor the increase in immigration quotas. In the initial fold of the two-fold effect, enhancing quotas is beneficial for a society and an economy, primarily because of the fact that the quality of human resource flows in from various backgrounds and cultures, having a diversified set of skills and strengths that become beneficial for the economy in the long run. However, in the long run, immigrants tend to form lobbies which are harmful to the viability of the business.